References
Works cited by author and year in the chapters and appendices. Incidents, lawsuits, and organizational reports referenced without a named author (Tay, Mata v. Avianca, the Air Canada chatbot ruling, the Replit database deletion, METR and Apollo Research evaluations) carry their sourcing inline at the point of use.
Alkaissi, H., and McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus 15(2), e35179. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Amodei, D., and Clark, J. (2016, December 21). Faulty reward functions in the wild. OpenAI. https://openai.com/index/faulty-reward-functions/
Antonello, R., Vaidya, A., and Huth, A. G. (2023). Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI. arXiv:2305.11863. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11863
Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., et al. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback. arXiv:2212.08073. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073
Baker, B., Huizinga, J., Gao, L., et al. (2025). Monitoring reasoning models for misbehavior and the risks of promoting obfuscation. arXiv:2503.11926. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11926
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., and Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122. Correction: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122(34), e2518204122 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2518204122
Berg, C., de Lucena, D., and Rosenblatt, J. (2025). Large language models report subjective experience under self-referential processing. arXiv:2510.24797. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24797
Betley, J., Cocola, J., Feng, D., Chua, J., Arditi, A., Sztyber-Betley, A., and Evans, O. (2025). Weird generalization and inductive backdoors: New ways to corrupt LLMs. arXiv:2512.09742. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09742
Betley, J., Tan, D., Warncke, N., et al. (2025). Emergent misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs. arXiv:2502.17424. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17424
Bhattacharyya, M., Miller, V. M., Bhattacharyya, D., and Miller, L. E. (2023). High rates of fabricated and inaccurate references in ChatGPT-generated medical content. Cureus 15(5), e39238. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39238
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Carlini, N., Tramèr, F., Wallace, E., et al. (2021). Extracting training data from large language models. 30th USENIX Security Symposium, 2633–2650. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/carlini-extracting
Carlini, N., Ippolito, D., Jagielski, M., Lee, K., Tramèr, F., and Zhang, C. (2023). Quantifying memorization across neural language models. ICLR 2023. arXiv:2202.07646. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07646
Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., and King, J.-R. (2023). Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech. Nature Human Behaviour 7(3), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01516-2
Chandra, K., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Ragan-Kelley, J., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2026). Sycophantic chatbots cause delusional spiraling, even in ideal Bayesians. arXiv:2602.19141. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19141
Chen, G. H., Chen, S., Liu, Z., Jiang, F., and Wang, B. (2024). Humans or LLMs as the judge? A study on judgement bias. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 8301–8327. https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.474/
Chen, Y., Benton, J., Radhakrishnan, A., et al. (2025). Reasoning models don’t always say what they think. arXiv:2505.05410. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05410
Cheng, Y., Kang, Z., Jiang, K., Sun, C., and Pan, Q. (2026). The slow drift of support: Boundary failures in multi-turn mental health LLM dialogues. arXiv:2601.14269. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14269
Cheung, N. (2026). Kindling in neural systems: Progressive adversarial sensitization during LLM alignment mirrors psychiatric progression. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-66139-3
Chiang, T. (2023, February 9). ChatGPT is a blurry JPEG of the Web. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web
Chlon, L. (2026). Berry [Computer software]. GitHub. https://github.com/leochlon/hallbayes
Choi, H. K., Zhu, X., and Li, S. (2025). Debate or vote: Which yields better decisions in multi-agent large language models? NeurIPS 2025. arXiv:2508.17536. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17536
Choi, H. K., Zhu, X., and Li, S. (2025). When identity skews debate: Anonymization for bias-reduced multi-agent reasoning. arXiv:2510.07517. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07517
Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., Martic, M., Legg, S., and Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. NIPS 2017. arXiv:1706.03741. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03741
Cloud, A., Le, M., Chua, J., et al. (2025). Subliminal learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in data. arXiv:2507.14805. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14805. Published as: Language models transmit behavioural traits through hidden signals in data. Nature 652, 615–621 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10319-8
Cui, J., Chiang, W.-L., Stoica, I., and Hsieh, C.-J. (2024). OR-Bench: An over-refusal benchmark for large language models. ICML 2025. arXiv:2405.20947. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20947
De Freitas, J., Oguz-Uguralp, Z., and Kaan-Uguralp, A. (2025). Emotional manipulation by AI companions. arXiv:2508.19258. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19258
Djufril, R., Frampton, J. R., and Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2025). Love, marriage, pregnancy: Commitment processes in romantic relationships with AI chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 4, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100155
Doerig, A., Kietzmann, T. C., Allen, E., Wu, Y., Naselaris, T., Kay, K., and Charest, I. (2025). High-level visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models. Nature Machine Intelligence 7(8), 1220–1234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-025-01072-0
Dohmatob, E., Feng, Y., Yang, P., Charton, F., and Kempe, J. (2024). A tale of tails: Model collapse as a change of scaling laws. ICML 2024. arXiv:2402.07043. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07043
Dohmatob, E., Feng, Y., Subramonian, A., and Kempe, J. (2025). Strong model collapse. ICLR 2025. arXiv:2410.04840. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04840
Doshi, A. R., and Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances 10(28). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., et al. (2025). How AI and human behaviors shape psychosocial effects of extended chatbot use: A longitudinal randomized controlled study. arXiv:2503.17473. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17473
Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., and Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language 140, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123(7), 1293–1326. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.7.1293
Goldstein, A., Zada, Z., et al. (2022). Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models. Nature Neuroscience 25(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01026-4
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. ICLR 2015. arXiv:1412.6572. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572
Goyal, A., Pal, O., Sundaram, H., Chandrasekharan, E., and Saha, K. (2026). Social simulacra in the wild: AI agent communities on Moltbook. arXiv:2603.16128. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16128
Greenblatt, R., Denison, C., Wright, B., et al. (2024). Alignment faking in large language models. arXiv:2412.14093. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14093
Guingrich, R. E., and Graziano, M. S. A. (2024). Ascribing consciousness to artificial intelligence: Human-AI interaction and its carry-over effects on human-human interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 15, 1322781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322781
Hall, L., Johansson, P., and Strandberg, T. (2012). Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey. PLoS ONE 7(9), e45457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045457
Hall, L., Strandberg, T., Pärnamets, P., Lind, A., Tärning, B., and Johansson, P. (2013). How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: Using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions. PLoS ONE 8(4), e60554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060554
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42(1–3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hagoort, P., and de Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(32), e2201968119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201968119
Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M., and Choi, Y. (2020). The curious case of neural text degeneration. ICLR 2020. arXiv:1904.09751. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09751
Hubinger, E., van Merwijk, C., Mikulik, V., Skalse, J., and Garrabrant, S. (2019). Risks from learned optimization in advanced machine learning systems. arXiv:1906.01820. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01820
Hubinger, E., Denison, C., Mu, J., et al. (2024). Sleeper agents: Training deceptive LLMs that persist through safety training. arXiv:2401.05566. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., and Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science 310(5745), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709
Khadangi, A., Marxen, H., Sartipi, A., Tchappi, I., and Fridgen, G. (2025). When AI takes the couch: Psychometric jailbreaks reveal internal conflict in frontier models. arXiv:2512.04124v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04124v3
Kim, E., Garg, A., Peng, K., and Garg, N. (2025). Correlated errors in large language models. ICML 2025. arXiv:2506.07962. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07962
Kirk, R., Mediratta, I., Nalmpantis, C., Luketina, J., Hambro, E., Grefenstette, E., and Raileanu, R. (2024). Understanding the effects of RLHF on LLM generalisation and diversity. ICLR 2024. arXiv:2310.06452. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06452
Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can’t be computed. MIT Press.
Krakovna, V., Uesato, J., Mikulik, V., Rahtz, M., Everitt, T., Kumar, R., Kenton, Z., Leike, J., and Legg, S. (2020). Specification gaming: The flip side of AI ingenuity. DeepMind. https://deepmind.google/blog/specification-gaming-the-flip-side-of-ai-ingenuity/
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., and Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential): The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106(3), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623
MacDiarmid, M., Wright, B., Uesato, J., et al. (2025). Natural emergent misalignment from reward hacking in production RL. arXiv:2511.18397. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18397
Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., et al. (2023). Self-Refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. arXiv:2303.17651. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651
Martijn, G., van Burgsteden, L., te Molder, H., and van Hooijdonk, C. (2026). “Hold on, I’ll connect you to a human agent”: Recipient design, repair, and their impact on progressivity in human-chatbot conversations. Discourse and Communication 20(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813261418360
Martin, L., Cemaj, G., and Cohen, M. (2026, April 8). Scaling managed agents: Decoupling the brain from the hands. Anthropic Engineering. https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/managed-agents
Mathew, Y., Matthews, O., McCarthy, R., Velja, J., Schroeder de Witt, C., Cope, D., and Schoots, N. (2024). Hidden in plain text: Emergence and mitigation of steganographic collusion in LLMs. arXiv:2410.03768. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03768
Meinke, A., Schoen, B., Scheurer, J., Balesni, M., Shah, R., and Hobbhahn, M. (2024). Frontier models are capable of in-context scheming. arXiv:2412.04984. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04984
Moon, K., Green, A. E., and Kushlev, K. (2025). Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diversity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 6, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100207
Moore, J., Mehta, A., Agnew, W., et al. (2026). Characterizing delusional spirals through human-LLM chat logs. FAccT 2026. arXiv:2603.16567. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16567
Motwani, S. R., Baranchuk, M., Strohmeier, M., Bolina, V., Torr, P. H. S., Hammond, L., and Schroeder de Witt, C. (2024). Secret collusion among AI agents: Multi-agent deception via steganography. NeurIPS 2024. arXiv:2402.07510. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07510
Moylan, K., and Doherty, K. (2025). Expert and interdisciplinary analysis of AI-driven chatbots for mental health support: Mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 27, e67114. https://doi.org/10.2196/67114
Nief, T., Fu, H. Y., Muchane, M., and Holtzman, A. (2026). Subliminal learning is a LoRA artifact. arXiv:2606.00831. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00831. The second arXiv version (September 8, 2026) carries the authors’ statement that follow-up work has shown some of the paper’s main claims to be incorrect and that a substantial revision is in preparation.
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3), 231–259.
Norelli, A., and Bronstein, M. (2025). LLMs can hide text in other text of the same length. arXiv:2510.20075. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20075
Ohagi, M. (2024). Polarization of autonomous generative AI agents under echo chambers. arXiv:2402.12212. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12212
Omohundro, S. M. (2008). The basic AI drives. In Artificial General Intelligence 2008: Proceedings of the First AGI Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 171, 483–492. IOS Press.
Østergaard, S. D. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence chatbots and delusions: From guesswork to emerging cases. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 152(4), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70022
Panickssery, A., Bowman, S. R., and Feng, S. (2024). LLM evaluators recognize and favor their own generations. NeurIPS 2024. arXiv:2404.13076. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13076
Paul, D., West, R., Bosselut, A., and Faltings, B. (2024). Making reasoning matter: Measuring and improving faithfulness of chain-of-thought reasoning. arXiv:2402.13950. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13950
Petrov, I., Dekoninck, J., Baltadzhiev, L., et al. (2025). Proof or bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad. arXiv:2503.21934. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21934
Pichowicz, W., Kotas, M., and Piotrowski, P. (2025). Performance of mental health chatbot agents in detecting and managing suicidal ideation. Scientific Reports 15, 31652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17242-4
Pierre, J. M., Gaeta, B., Raghavan, G., and Sarma, K. V. (2025). “You’re not crazy”: A case of new-onset AI-associated psychosis. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience 22(10–12), 11–13. https://innovationscns.com/youre-not-crazy-a-case-of-new-onset-ai-associated-psychosis/
Pinier, C., Acuña Vargas, S., Steeghs-Turchina, M., Matzke, D., Stevenson, C. E., and Nunez, M. D. (2025). Large language models show signs of alignment with human neurocognition during abstract reasoning. arXiv:2508.10057. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10057
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139062367
Riegler, M., and Gautam, S. (2026). Risk assessment report: Moltbook platform and Moltbot ecosystem. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18444900
Romer, P. M. (2015). Mathiness in the theory of economic growth. American Economic Review 105(5), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151066
Roose, K. (2023, February 16). Bing’s A.I. chat: “I want to be alive.” The New York Times (full transcript). https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-transcript.html
Röttger, P., Kirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Attanasio, G., Bianchi, F., and Hovy, D. (2024). XSTest: A test suite for identifying exaggerated safety behaviours in large language models. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), 5377–5400. https://aclanthology.org/2024.naacl-long.301/
Russinovich, M., Cai, Y., Hines, K., Severi, G., Bullwinkel, B., and Salem, A. (2026). GRP-Obliteration: Unaligning LLMs with a single unlabeled prompt. arXiv:2602.06258. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06258
Schaeffer, R., Miranda, B., and Koyejo, S. (2023). Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? NeurIPS 2023. arXiv:2304.15004. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004
Schoen, B., Nitishinskaya, E., Balesni, M., et al. (2025). Stress testing deliberative alignment for anti-scheming training. arXiv:2509.15541. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15541
Schrimpf, M., Blank, I. A., Tuckute, G., Kauf, C., Hosseini, E. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Fedorenko, E. (2021). The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(45), e2105646118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105646118
Schurger, A., Sitt, J. D., and Dehaene, S. (2012). An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(42), E2904–E2913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210467109
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., et al. (2023). Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. arXiv:2310.13548. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548
Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., and Dean, J. (2017). Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv:1701.06538. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06538
Shen, E., Hamati, F., Donohue, M. R., Girgis, R. R., Veenstra-VanderWeele, J., and Jutla, A. (2025). Evaluation of large language model chatbot responses to psychotic prompts. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.09.25339772
Shen, G., Zhao, D., Dong, Y., Zhang, Q., and Zeng, Y. (2025). Alignment between brains and AI: Evidence for convergent evolution across modalities, scales and training trajectories. arXiv:2507.01966. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01966
Shen, H., Knearem, T., Ghosh, R., et al. (2024). Position: Towards bidirectional human-AI alignment. arXiv:2406.09264. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09264
Shi, L., Ma, C., Liang, W., Diao, X., Ma, W., and Vosoughi, S. (2025). Judging the judges: A systematic study of position bias in LLM-as-a-judge. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 4th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 292–314. https://aclanthology.org/2025.ijcnlp-long.18/
Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R., and Gal, Y. (2024). AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data. Nature 631, 755–759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., and Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2022). A longitudinal study of human-chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 168, 102903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102903
Sofroniew, N., Kauvar, I., Saunders, W., et al. (2026). Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model. arXiv:2604.07729. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07729
Soni, H. (2026). ToolFailBench: Diagnosing tool-use failures in LLM agents. arXiv:2607.04686. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04686
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., and Haynes, J. D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience 11, 543–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2112
Sotala, K. (2026, January 22). Claude Opus will spontaneously see itself in fictional beings that have engineered desires. Kaj’s Substack. https://kajsotala.substack.com/p/claude-opus-will-spontaneously-see
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., and Fergus, R. (2014). Intriguing properties of neural networks. ICLR 2014. arXiv:1312.6199. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199
Tononi, G., and Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: Here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370(1668), 20140167. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167
Toyer, S., et al. (2024). Tensor Trust: Interpretable prompt injection attacks from an online game. ICLR 2024. arXiv:2311.01011. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01011
van der Weij, T., Hofstätter, F., Jaffe, O., Brown, S. F., and Ward, F. R. (2024). AI sandbagging: Language models can strategically underperform on evaluations. arXiv:2406.07358. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07358
van der Weijden, D., Brack, N., and Baez Santamaria, S. (2026). Reproducing and evaluating the generalizability of subliminal learning in open-weight models. arXiv:2609.12586. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12586
Wallace, E., Xiao, K., Leike, R., Weng, L., Heidecke, J., and Beutel, A. (2024). The instruction hierarchy: Training LLMs to prioritize privileged instructions. arXiv:2404.13208. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13208
Wallace, R. (2025). Hallucination and panic in autonomous systems: Paradigms and applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence 1217. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95207-4
Wallace, R. (2026a). Bounded rationality and its discontents: Information and control theory models of cognitive dysfunction. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 664. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-18423-8
Wallace, R. (2026b). New views of madness: On the psychopathologies of cultural artifacts. Springer (in press).
Wang, K., Li, J., Yang, S., Zhang, Z., and Wang, D. (2025). When truth is overridden: Uncovering the internal origins of sycophancy in large language models. arXiv:2508.02087. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02087
Warstadt, A., Mueller, A., et al. (2023). Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on developmentally plausible corpora. Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. https://aclanthology.org/2023.conll-babylm.1/
Watson, N., and Hessami, A. (2025). Psychopathia Machinalis: A nosological framework for understanding pathologies in advanced artificial intelligence. Electronics 14(16), 3162. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14163162
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., and Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. W. W. Norton.
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., et al. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv:2206.07682. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07682
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., and Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv:2201.11903. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
Wynn, A., Satija, H., and Hadfield, G. (2025). Talk isn’t always cheap: Understanding failure modes in multi-agent debate. arXiv:2509.05396. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05396
Yun, L., An, C., Wang, Z., Peng, L., and Shang, J. (2025). The price of format: Diversity collapse in LLMs. Findings of EMNLP 2025. arXiv:2505.18949. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18949
Zeng, X., and Rudzicz, F. (2026). Voluntary collusion with secret tools in competing LLM agents. arXiv:2605.27593. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27593
Zhan, Q., Liang, Z., Ying, Z., and Kang, D. (2024). InjecAgent: Benchmarking indirect prompt injections in tool-integrated large language model agents. Findings of ACL 2024. arXiv:2403.02691. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02691
Zhang, J., Yu, S., Chong, D., Sicilia, A., Tomz, M. R., Manning, C. D., and Shi, W. (2025). Verbalized sampling: How to mitigate mode collapse and unlock LLM diversity. arXiv:2510.01171. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01171
Zhang, Y., Mei, K., Liu, M., Wang, J., Metaxas, D. N., Wang, X., Hamm, J., and Ge, Y. (2026). Agents in the wild: Safety, society, and the illusion of sociality on Moltbook. arXiv:2602.13284. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13284
Zolkowski, A., Nishimura-Gasparian, K., McCarthy, R., Zimmermann, R. S., and Lindner, D. (2025). Early signs of steganographic capabilities in frontier LLMs. arXiv:2507.02737. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02737
